Archive for February, 2010

Confucius…

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

Austin thing…

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

“I think we’re on the ragged edge, and this Austin thing is a clear warning shot across the bow,” says Doug Casey, reflecting on last week’s aerial suicide attack on a federal building in Texas housing IRS offices.

“When individuals start taking actions like this, it can change things. An army of one can sting, but what happens when you have 100,000 armies of one? Or a couple million? Just think of what would have happened back before World War II in Germany if each one of the millions of Jews and Gypsies and others the Nazis rounded up had fought back. The death camps were made possible by people who, although they had the capacity to act like wolves, acted like sheep.

“I’m not saying things will go that way in the U.S. But I do think there’s increasing resentment on the part of the average citizen against those who work for ‘The Man.’”

From The 5 Minute Forecast

545 PEOPLE

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget.  The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You  and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress.  In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.. They have no legal authority.  They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing.  I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.  The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault.  They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall..  No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits..  The president can only propose a budget.  He cannot force the Congress to accept  it..

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.  Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi.  She is the leader of the majority party.  She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want.  If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of  incompetence and irresponsibility.  I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.  When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red ..

If the Army & Marines are in  IRAQ ,  it’s because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems..

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.  Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

Thanks for “A Favor”

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Dear Reader,

I would like to thank all those wonderful people who responded to our email and offered their opinion on what the phrase:

“In short the Plaintiff loaned money, in the form of a credit line, to Defendant.”

means.

Just for your reference, here’s how we analyzed the phrase and how we suggest you analysis statements from banks, collection agencies, and attorneys.

*************************************************

We found that the term:  “in the form of a credit line” caused people the most problems.

The easiest way to understand what something means is to substitute terms you know for terms you’re not sure of.  What if the Plaintiff had written:  “In short the Plaintiff loaned money, in the form of cocaine, to Defendant.”  Now its clearer.  You know Plaintiff didn’t really lend money, it lent cocaine.  That’s what Defendant would have actually gotten.

What if Plaintiff had written: “In short the Plaintiff loaned money, in the form of bull poop, to the Defendant.”  Again, much clearer.  You know Plaintiff didn’t really lend money, it lent bull poop.  That’s what the Defendant would have actually gotten.

The real proof is in the actual meanings of the words.  Relying on Defendant’s wonderful legal dictionary (Black’s Sixth Edition) we find that the word “form” means:  Antithesis of “substance.”  And “substance” means: Essence; the material or essential part of a thing, as distinguished from “form.”  That which is essential.  We have to rely on Webster for the definition of “Antithesis:”  1.    a contrast or opposition of thoughts, usually in two phrases, clauses, or sentences (Ex. You are going; I am staying)  2.  the second part of such an expression  3.  a contrast or opposition  4.  the exact opposite.

If we apply these definitions to Plaintiff’s phrase we end up with:   “In short the Plaintiff loaned money (substance), in the form of a credit line (the opposite of money, i.e. Credit or Debt), to Defendant.”  Either of which is illegal and renders Plaintiff’s agreement void and the instant court has no jurisdiction over a void contract.  It doesn’t exist.

*************************************************

Again, thanks for your help.  We really appreciate it.

Hope this helps in some way.

Jim

What are you dismissing?

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Dear Reader,

“When we dismiss people and ideas because the entire world doesn’t agree with them, we get to be right.  But we also get to stay empty inside.  By dismissing what could work, we dismiss our own growth.  We dismiss what’s possible.

“It doesn’t matter if the book you read and love is loved by anyone else.  It doesn’t matter if the teacher you admire is admired by anyone else.  It doesn’t matter if the healing method that worked for you doesn’t work for everyone else.

“What matters is you.  Your happiness.  Your health.  Your healing.  Your well-being.

“The truth is, no method works for everyone.  No teacher is right for everyone.  No book is going to inspire everyone.

“It all comes from within.  You are the first and final authority on your life.

“Rather than dismissing what is possible so that you can be right, what can accept so that you can grow?

“Dismissing is often a way to deflect the messages.  It’s a self-defense mechanism.  If you dismiss the book, idea, or method offered to you, you get to be right – and stay right where you are.

“Dr. Richard Gillett, writing in his wonderful book, Change Your Mind, Change Your World, states, ‘Disapproval is, surprisingly, the most reliable indication of a hidden belief system.  Quite often the only way disguised beliefs show themselves is through moments of emotional judgment or disapproval.’

All the successful people I know have accepted new tools into their lives over the years, spent thousands of dollars on personal growth and self-study, and never regretted any of it.

“The key is not dismissing, or disapproving, but digesting.

“For example, Nerissa and I had dinner with friends recently.  One friend was complaining about her job.  From her perspective, there was no way out of the misery she felt at her place of work.  Bad boss.  Bad hours.  Bad pay.  You name it, it was bad.

“Later, we were joined by other friends.  As ‘chance’ would have it, one of the new friends had connections where our complaining friend worked.  He gave our unhappy friend a name, and said he could help her resolve her issues.  He went on to say that this connection was a supervisor, head of many departments, and could probably resolve whatever was wrong.

“I was stunned.  So was Nerissa.  We were seeing magic happen right before your eyes.

“But what did our unhappy friend do with here new lead and new hope?

“She dismissed it.

“She didn’t write down the name or the number, or show any signs that something wonderful had just occured.

“Do you see how this works?”

Joe Vitale from The Attractor Factor